<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 7 - CESTAT (CHENNAI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a case concerning Service Tax demands for &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; and &#039;Goods Transport&#039; services. The demands were deemed beyond the limitation period and affected by the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Laghu Udyog Bharati. The Tribunal held that the demands were not valid due to being raised after relevant amendments and beyond the prescribed limitation period, ruling in favor of the assessees in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 7 - CESTAT (CHENNAI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in a case concerning Service Tax demands for &#039;Clearing and Forwarding&#039; and &#039;Goods Transport&#039; services. The demands were deemed beyond the limitation period and affected by the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Laghu Udyog Bharati. The Tribunal held that the demands were not valid due to being raised after relevant amendments and beyond the prescribed limitation period, ruling in favor of the assessees in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>