<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 78: Penalty Must Match Service Tax Shortfall; Lower Courts Can&#039;t Reduce Statutory Penalty Amount.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24671</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 78 - the provisions that shall apply are those existing at the time of commission of the offence. Therefore, there was no scope for the lower appellate authorities to reduce the penalty from the statutory stipulated penalty equal to amount of service tax short paid - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:32:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 78: Penalty Must Match Service Tax Shortfall; Lower Courts Can&#039;t Reduce Statutory Penalty Amount.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24671</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 78 - the provisions that shall apply are those existing at the time of commission of the offence. Therefore, there was no scope for the lower appellate authorities to reduce the penalty from the statutory stipulated penalty equal to amount of service tax short paid - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:32:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>