<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 524 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173228</link>
    <description>Delay was not condoned, and the Civil Appeal was dismissed on that procedural ground. The order does not record any determination on the substantive central excise issues, so the operative effect is limited to termination of the appeal for want of condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 524 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173228</link>
      <description>Delay was not condoned, and the Civil Appeal was dismissed on that procedural ground. The order does not record any determination on the substantive central excise issues, so the operative effect is limited to termination of the appeal for want of condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>