<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173220</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee on multiple tax-related issues, including allowing provision for warranty expenses, deleting foreign exchange fluctuation loss, clarifying the applicability of Section 234D from AY 2004-05, and upholding the deduction of advertisement and sales promotion expenses. The Court also dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowance of 10% of such expenses and upheld the inclusion of foreign exchange gain in profits eligible for deduction under sections 10A/10B. Transfer pricing adjustments were deferred for further examination. The judgment provided detailed analysis and referenced legal precedents to support the decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173220</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee on multiple tax-related issues, including allowing provision for warranty expenses, deleting foreign exchange fluctuation loss, clarifying the applicability of Section 234D from AY 2004-05, and upholding the deduction of advertisement and sales promotion expenses. The Court also dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowance of 10% of such expenses and upheld the inclusion of foreign exchange gain in profits eligible for deduction under sections 10A/10B. Transfer pricing adjustments were deferred for further examination. The judgment provided detailed analysis and referenced legal precedents to support the decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>