<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173215</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to medical treatment reasons. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision setting aside service tax on training and coaching by educational institutions, deeming it unjustified and discriminatory. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on this reasoning, in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173215</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to medical treatment reasons. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision setting aside service tax on training and coaching by educational institutions, deeming it unjustified and discriminatory. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on this reasoning, in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>