<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 500 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173213</link>
    <description>A criminal appeal by a sentenced appellant could not be registered or heard in the Supreme Court unless the appellant had surrendered or obtained an express order exempting surrender. The Supreme Court Rules were treated as mandatory, and the appeal petition had to disclose surrender status before registration. The Special Court Act&#039;s power for the Special Court to regulate its own procedure did not extend to overriding the Supreme Court&#039;s appellate procedure. Earlier orders made without addressing the mandatory surrender requirement were treated as per incuriam and given no precedential value. The request to proceed without surrender was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 500 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173213</link>
      <description>A criminal appeal by a sentenced appellant could not be registered or heard in the Supreme Court unless the appellant had surrendered or obtained an express order exempting surrender. The Supreme Court Rules were treated as mandatory, and the appeal petition had to disclose surrender status before registration. The Special Court Act&#039;s power for the Special Court to regulate its own procedure did not extend to overriding the Supreme Court&#039;s appellate procedure. Earlier orders made without addressing the mandatory surrender requirement were treated as per incuriam and given no precedential value. The request to proceed without surrender was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>