<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173212</link>
    <description>Software sold along with or separately from computers is treated as distinct from the computer for excise valuation under Chapter 85. In light of the Supreme Court&#039;s view that computer software cannot be regarded as part of the computer, its value is not includible in the assessable value of computers for excise duty. The note rejects earlier approaches that had treated software as part of the computer and applies the binding distinction between the two for valuation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173212</link>
      <description>Software sold along with or separately from computers is treated as distinct from the computer for excise valuation under Chapter 85. In light of the Supreme Court&#039;s view that computer software cannot be regarded as part of the computer, its value is not includible in the assessable value of computers for excise duty. The note rejects earlier approaches that had treated software as part of the computer and applies the binding distinction between the two for valuation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>