<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263808</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on educational and vocational training services provided by a non-profit organization for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. The tribunal agreed with the Commissioner(Appeals) that the appellant&#039;s registration under the service tax category post-amendment in 2010, along with the absence of malafide intent to evade tax and regular tax payments, justified the absence of penalties. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation issue, remanding the matter for further examination regarding the application of the longer period of limitation due to the absence of mala fide suppression.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263808</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on educational and vocational training services provided by a non-profit organization for the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. The tribunal agreed with the Commissioner(Appeals) that the appellant&#039;s registration under the service tax category post-amendment in 2010, along with the absence of malafide intent to evade tax and regular tax payments, justified the absence of penalties. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation issue, remanding the matter for further examination regarding the application of the longer period of limitation due to the absence of mala fide suppression.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>