https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263795 The High Court found the Writ Petition to be an abuse of writ jurisdiction due to the Petitioner's non-compliance with court orders and seeking relief. The Petitioner claimed exemption from duty payment for manufactured goods but faced allegations of contravening excise laws, leading to a demand for duty payment and penalties. The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner's Appeal for failing to comply with pre-deposit conditions. Despite multiple attempts, subsequent Writ Petitions were dismissed for non-compliance. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and procedures, ultimately dismissing the Writ Petition and ordering the Petitioner to pay costs to the Respondents. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:20:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263795 The High Court found the Writ Petition to be an abuse of writ jurisdiction due to the Petitioner's non-compliance with court orders and seeking relief. The Petitioner claimed exemption from duty payment for manufactured goods but faced allegations of contravening excise laws, leading to a demand for duty payment and penalties. The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner's Appeal for failing to comply with pre-deposit conditions. Despite multiple attempts, subsequent Writ Petitions were dismissed for non-compliance. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and procedures, ultimately dismissing the Writ Petition and ordering the Petitioner to pay costs to the Respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263795