<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 459 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263791</link>
    <description>Where two exemption notifications are available, an assessee may choose the more beneficial unconditional notification, and the department cannot require adoption of a nil-rate exemption merely because input duty credit was not taken. On that basis, goods cleared partly on duty and partly under full exemption could not be treated as having been used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted goods. The denial of capital goods Cenvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the related demand, interest, and penalty could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:20:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 459 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263791</link>
      <description>Where two exemption notifications are available, an assessee may choose the more beneficial unconditional notification, and the department cannot require adoption of a nil-rate exemption merely because input duty credit was not taken. On that basis, goods cleared partly on duty and partly under full exemption could not be treated as having been used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted goods. The denial of capital goods Cenvat credit was therefore unsustainable, and the related demand, interest, and penalty could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>