https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263788 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to confirm the pre-deposit order against the appellant, emphasizing the appellant's involvement in fraudulent import practices and evasion of customs duty. The penalty imposed under Section 114A of the Customs Act was deemed justified due to the appellant's participation in illegal import activities. The appellant's failure to appear before the lower authorities and Tribunal, lack of engagement throughout the adjudication process, and established role in the fraudulent scheme led to the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 May 2016 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263788 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to confirm the pre-deposit order against the appellant, emphasizing the appellant's involvement in fraudulent import practices and evasion of customs duty. The penalty imposed under Section 114A of the Customs Act was deemed justified due to the appellant's participation in illegal import activities. The appellant's failure to appear before the lower authorities and Tribunal, lack of engagement throughout the adjudication process, and established role in the fraudulent scheme led to the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263788