<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 436 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263768</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, while directing the deletion of the penalty on the amount where relief was granted. The decision was based on considerations of the explanations provided by the assessee, relevant legal provisions, and case laws. The tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing facts, applying legal principles, and following binding decisions in confirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 436 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263768</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, while directing the deletion of the penalty on the amount where relief was granted. The decision was based on considerations of the explanations provided by the assessee, relevant legal provisions, and case laws. The tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing facts, applying legal principles, and following binding decisions in confirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>