<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 431 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263763</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the advances made for business purposes and commercial expediency justified the interest expenses. The disallowance by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unsustainable. As a result, the tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10,54,790/-, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 431 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263763</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the advances made for business purposes and commercial expediency justified the interest expenses. The disallowance by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was deemed unsustainable. As a result, the tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10,54,790/-, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>