<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 428 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263760</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, holding the assessee eligible for exemption under section 54F and overturning the CIT&#039;s decision. The ITAT emphasized the absence of restrictions in the statutory provisions, affirming the right of the assessee to claim exemptions under both sections 54B and 54F. The assessment order was set aside for a de novo assessment, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the profit estimation and denying the exemption under section 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 428 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263760</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, holding the assessee eligible for exemption under section 54F and overturning the CIT&#039;s decision. The ITAT emphasized the absence of restrictions in the statutory provisions, affirming the right of the assessee to claim exemptions under both sections 54B and 54F. The assessment order was set aside for a de novo assessment, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the profit estimation and denying the exemption under section 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>