https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173207 The court allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned judgments. It concluded that the dependents of deceased daily wage employees were not entitled to compassionate appointments under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, as the deceased employees did not meet the definition of "government servant" under the Rules. The court emphasized the supremacy of statutory rules over executive instructions and clarified the retrospective application of judicial decisions, stating that unless specified otherwise, judicial decisions are generally retrospective. en-us Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173207 The court allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned judgments. It concluded that the dependents of deceased daily wage employees were not entitled to compassionate appointments under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, as the deceased employees did not meet the definition of "government servant" under the Rules. The court emphasized the supremacy of statutory rules over executive instructions and clarified the retrospective application of judicial decisions, stating that unless specified otherwise, judicial decisions are generally retrospective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173207