https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205 Promotion under the Mizoram Engineering Service Rules, 2001 had to follow the assessment scheme in the Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2002, which required the DPC to examine service records and ACRs beyond the overall grading and to consider ACRs available for the year immediately preceding the vacancy or panel year. The later clarification dated 13.09.2004 was treated as explanatory of the original instruction and therefore retrospective. On that construction, the DPC was entitled to apply the clarified regime rather than exclude the later ACR position, and the Division Bench's view was consistent with the governing promotion framework. en-us Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205 Promotion under the Mizoram Engineering Service Rules, 2001 had to follow the assessment scheme in the Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2002, which required the DPC to examine service records and ACRs beyond the overall grading and to consider ACRs available for the year immediately preceding the vacancy or panel year. The later clarification dated 13.09.2004 was treated as explanatory of the original instruction and therefore retrospective. On that construction, the DPC was entitled to apply the clarified regime rather than exclude the later ACR position, and the Division Bench's view was consistent with the governing promotion framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205