<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 598 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench&#039;s decision that the ACR for the year ending 31.03.2003 should not be considered for promotion. Emphasizing the importance of following procedures, the Court highlighted the retrospective effect of clarificatory memoranda for fair promotions. It reinforced considering both seniority and merit in line with rules and guidelines, dismissing the appeals and affirming the Division Bench&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 598 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench&#039;s decision that the ACR for the year ending 31.03.2003 should not be considered for promotion. Emphasizing the importance of following procedures, the Court highlighted the retrospective effect of clarificatory memoranda for fair promotions. It reinforced considering both seniority and merit in line with rules and guidelines, dismissing the appeals and affirming the Division Bench&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>