<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 158 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173204</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Rules 28B and 32 but declared the Circular dated August 27, 1966, as illegal and invalid. It directed the reconsideration of promotions of certain respondents, excluding the Circular from consideration. Allegations of mala fides against the State were dismissed. The appeal was partially allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:26:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 158 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173204</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Rules 28B and 32 but declared the Circular dated August 27, 1966, as illegal and invalid. It directed the reconsideration of promotions of certain respondents, excluding the Circular from consideration. Allegations of mala fides against the State were dismissed. The appeal was partially allowed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>