https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173199 The appeal was dismissed without costs. The Court upheld the validity of the adverse remarks made by the Chief of the Army Staff based on a Court of Enquiry's report. The Selection Board's decision not to promote the appellant was deemed to be based on an overall assessment rather than solely on the adverse remarks. The timing of the disposal of the statutory complaint did not affect the Board's decision. The Court did not opine on the validity of the Central Government's rejection of the statutory complaint, allowing the appellant to challenge it through appropriate legal channels. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173199 The appeal was dismissed without costs. The Court upheld the validity of the adverse remarks made by the Chief of the Army Staff based on a Court of Enquiry's report. The Selection Board's decision not to promote the appellant was deemed to be based on an overall assessment rather than solely on the adverse remarks. The timing of the disposal of the statutory complaint did not affect the Board's decision. The Court did not opine on the validity of the Central Government's rejection of the statutory complaint, allowing the appellant to challenge it through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173199