<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173196</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that a Commandant (Selection Grade) does not qualify for retirement at 58 years under Rule 9 as it is not considered a higher rank than Commandant. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment. The respondent was directed to retire at 55 years without recovery of emoluments received during the extended service period. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173196</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that a Commandant (Selection Grade) does not qualify for retirement at 58 years under Rule 9 as it is not considered a higher rank than Commandant. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment. The respondent was directed to retire at 55 years without recovery of emoluments received during the extended service period. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>