https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173195 The Supreme Court ruled that seniority in the Selection Scale should be based on the date of selection, not on seniority in the Senior Scale. The appellants, promoted in 1989, were deemed senior to respondent No. 1, promoted in 1991. The Court set aside the High Court's direction to revise the seniority list based on Senior Scale seniority. The challenge to Rule 8 of the Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954, regarding reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, was not upheld. The appeals were allowed, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and respondent No. 1's writ petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:22:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173195 The Supreme Court ruled that seniority in the Selection Scale should be based on the date of selection, not on seniority in the Senior Scale. The appellants, promoted in 1989, were deemed senior to respondent No. 1, promoted in 1991. The Court set aside the High Court's direction to revise the seniority list based on Senior Scale seniority. The challenge to Rule 8 of the Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954, regarding reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, was not upheld. The appeals were allowed, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and respondent No. 1's writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173195