<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 981 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173192</link>
    <description>Rule 14(a) of the Kerala State &amp; Subordinate Services Rules fixes 20 vacancies as the unit of appointment, and the reservation roster under Rules 14 to 17 must operate within each such unit. Meritorious reserved-category candidates may be adjusted against open competition turns only within that 20-vacancy framework, while the rotation, sub-rotation and integrated cycle provisions do not change the statutory unit. The Court held that treating vacancies reported in excess of 20 as a single unit would add a proviso not found in Rule 14(a) and impermissibly rewrite the scheme. The literal construction was preferred, and reservation was held to apply separately to each batch of 20 vacancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 981 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173192</link>
      <description>Rule 14(a) of the Kerala State &amp; Subordinate Services Rules fixes 20 vacancies as the unit of appointment, and the reservation roster under Rules 14 to 17 must operate within each such unit. Meritorious reserved-category candidates may be adjusted against open competition turns only within that 20-vacancy framework, while the rotation, sub-rotation and integrated cycle provisions do not change the statutory unit. The Court held that treating vacancies reported in excess of 20 as a single unit would add a proviso not found in Rule 14(a) and impermissibly rewrite the scheme. The literal construction was preferred, and reservation was held to apply separately to each batch of 20 vacancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>