<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 425 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties based on the income of the appellant and two students. However, it set aside the demand related to the clubbed income of the appellant&#039;s relatives. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to accurately quantify the demand and allowed the appellant to pay a reduced penalty within a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 425 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties based on the income of the appellant and two students. However, it set aside the demand related to the clubbed income of the appellant&#039;s relatives. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to accurately quantify the demand and allowed the appellant to pay a reduced penalty within a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>