https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173180 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming duty demand for the second part of the first import due to the absence of the EPCG license at the time. However, the EPCG benefit was granted for the second lot of import. The appellant succeeded in the classification dispute, resulting in no duty demand on that count. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 15:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173180 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming duty demand for the second part of the first import due to the absence of the EPCG license at the time. However, the EPCG benefit was granted for the second lot of import. The appellant succeeded in the classification dispute, resulting in no duty demand on that count. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173180