https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173144 The High Court upheld the validity of the interlocutory orders challenged by the petitioner under Section 32-I of the Central Excise Act, finding them not illegal or lacking jurisdiction. The Court clarified that the second respondent had not prejudged the issue but had merely exercised powers to request information. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the final decision of the second respondent in the future, but no interference was deemed necessary at the current stage. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 15:55:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173144 The High Court upheld the validity of the interlocutory orders challenged by the petitioner under Section 32-I of the Central Excise Act, finding them not illegal or lacking jurisdiction. The Court clarified that the second respondent had not prejudged the issue but had merely exercised powers to request information. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the final decision of the second respondent in the future, but no interference was deemed necessary at the current stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173144