https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173133 Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, amendment of the plaint was permitted because the existing pleadings already supplied the factual for challenging the sale deeds and related mutations. The proposed amendment was necessary to determine the real controversy, did not change the basic nature of the suit, and caused no prejudice to the respondents. It also furthered avoidance of multiplicity of litigation. The objection based on limitation was not accepted on the facts, and the refusal to allow amendment was set aside. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173133 Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, amendment of the plaint was permitted because the existing pleadings already supplied the factual for challenging the sale deeds and related mutations. The proposed amendment was necessary to determine the real controversy, did not change the basic nature of the suit, and caused no prejudice to the respondents. It also furthered avoidance of multiplicity of litigation. The objection based on limitation was not accepted on the facts, and the refusal to allow amendment was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173133