<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 913 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173126</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the controversy before it was a pure question of fact determined by the Tribunal. As the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion rested on factual findings rather than any legal error, the Court found no basis for appellate or judicial interference and declined to disturb those findings. The civil appeals were dismissed, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 15:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 913 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173126</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the controversy before it was a pure question of fact determined by the Tribunal. As the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion rested on factual findings rather than any legal error, the Court found no basis for appellate or judicial interference and declined to disturb those findings. The civil appeals were dismissed, and no order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>