<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 901 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173123</link>
    <description>Interim stay against the CESTAT order dated 30 November 2010 was refused because, on consideration of the facts and circumstances, the Rajasthan HC found no basis to suspend its operation. The stay application was therefore dismissed, leaving the tribunal&#039;s order in force pending the substantive appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 901 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173123</link>
      <description>Interim stay against the CESTAT order dated 30 November 2010 was refused because, on consideration of the facts and circumstances, the Rajasthan HC found no basis to suspend its operation. The stay application was therefore dismissed, leaving the tribunal&#039;s order in force pending the substantive appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>