<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 966 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173122</link>
    <description>The court allowed the release of most seized items upon payment of full duty and an indemnity bond. It directed the petitioner to apply under Section 110 A for the remaining items&#039; release, emphasizing the need for unaffected adjudication proceedings. The court expressed doubts on the legality of confiscating the entire consignment under Section 119, advising further examination by the adjudicating authority without giving a final opinion on the raised issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 966 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173122</link>
      <description>The court allowed the release of most seized items upon payment of full duty and an indemnity bond. It directed the petitioner to apply under Section 110 A for the remaining items&#039; release, emphasizing the need for unaffected adjudication proceedings. The court expressed doubts on the legality of confiscating the entire consignment under Section 119, advising further examination by the adjudicating authority without giving a final opinion on the raised issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>