<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173119</link>
    <description>A transfer made by an assessee during pending income-tax recovery proceedings was treated as vulnerable to the Revenue where the conditions of section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were satisfied. The proviso to section 281 was confined to transfers for valuable consideration without notice of the proceedings and was not expanded into a separate equitable protection for the transferee. Section 281 was held to operate in a different sphere from section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and rule 16 of the Second Schedule, which concerns post-attachment transfers, could not be used to dilute the statutory effect of a transfer made during pending recovery proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173119</link>
      <description>A transfer made by an assessee during pending income-tax recovery proceedings was treated as vulnerable to the Revenue where the conditions of section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were satisfied. The proviso to section 281 was confined to transfers for valuable consideration without notice of the proceedings and was not expanded into a separate equitable protection for the transferee. Section 281 was held to operate in a different sphere from section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and rule 16 of the Second Schedule, which concerns post-attachment transfers, could not be used to dilute the statutory effect of a transfer made during pending recovery proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>