<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173120</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and directed the respondents to pay the costs of the appellants. The Court emphasized that the High Court erred in allowing the writ petition based on alleged discriminatory treatment without proper investigation and findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173120</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and directed the respondents to pay the costs of the appellants. The Court emphasized that the High Court erred in allowing the writ petition based on alleged discriminatory treatment without proper investigation and findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>