<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Overturns Writ Petition Approval; Bona Fides of Petitioner in Dues Recovery Case Could Not Be Verified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24635</link>
    <description>Recovery of dues from third parties - no discretion ought to have been exercised in favour of the writ petitioner whose bonafide cannot be ascertained and as such, the order of the writ Court allowing the writ petition and quashing the notice dated 3-3-2006 at the behest of the writ petitioner-Bhishma Pithamaha, is liable to be set aside. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:11:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:11:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Overturns Writ Petition Approval; Bona Fides of Petitioner in Dues Recovery Case Could Not Be Verified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24635</link>
      <description>Recovery of dues from third parties - no discretion ought to have been exercised in favour of the writ petitioner whose bonafide cannot be ascertained and as such, the order of the writ Court allowing the writ petition and quashing the notice dated 3-3-2006 at the behest of the writ petitioner-Bhishma Pithamaha, is liable to be set aside. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:11:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>