<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 351 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173112</link>
    <description>In execution sale proceedings, mandatory notice requirements for a fresh execution application and for settlement of the sale proclamation must be complied with before further steps can validly proceed. Where personal service is not proved, the proclamation contains incorrect particulars, and the execution process is kept from the judgment-debtor until confirmation of sale, the sale is vitiated by material irregularity and fraud. The Court also treated a grossly inadequate sale price and the resulting deprivation of notice as sufficient to establish substantial injury. The auction sale was therefore set aside and the order nullifying it was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 351 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173112</link>
      <description>In execution sale proceedings, mandatory notice requirements for a fresh execution application and for settlement of the sale proclamation must be complied with before further steps can validly proceed. Where personal service is not proved, the proclamation contains incorrect particulars, and the execution process is kept from the judgment-debtor until confirmation of sale, the sale is vitiated by material irregularity and fraud. The Court also treated a grossly inadequate sale price and the resulting deprivation of notice as sufficient to establish substantial injury. The auction sale was therefore set aside and the order nullifying it was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>