<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 350 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173111</link>
    <description>Notice to the judgment-debtor before settlement of the sale proclamation is mandatory in execution of immovable property, and the court must judicially settle the proclamation with fair particulars after considering objections; failure to do so is a fundamental breach, not a mere irregularity, and the sale is void. The executing court must also restrict sale to only so much property as is necessary to satisfy the decree; sale of the entire immovable property without real consideration of a smaller portion constitutes excessive execution and material irregularity causing substantial injury. On both grounds, the sale and its confirmation were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 350 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173111</link>
      <description>Notice to the judgment-debtor before settlement of the sale proclamation is mandatory in execution of immovable property, and the court must judicially settle the proclamation with fair particulars after considering objections; failure to do so is a fundamental breach, not a mere irregularity, and the sale is void. The executing court must also restrict sale to only so much property as is necessary to satisfy the decree; sale of the entire immovable property without real consideration of a smaller portion constitutes excessive execution and material irregularity causing substantial injury. On both grounds, the sale and its confirmation were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>