https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173102 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the complaint as time-barred under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the limitation period, the Court highlighted the necessity for compliance. The issues of deficiency in service and authorization of B.M. Konar were deemed irrelevant due to the dismissal based on limitation. The parties were directed to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173102 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the complaint as time-barred under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the limitation period, the Court highlighted the necessity for compliance. The issues of deficiency in service and authorization of B.M. Konar were deemed irrelevant due to the dismissal based on limitation. The parties were directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173102