https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173099 The ITAT partly allowed the Assessee's appeals, directing a reexamination of the bonus payment issue and upholding the addition on foreign traveling expenses for all assessment years. The CIT(A)'s dismissal of the bonus payment addition was set aside, giving the Assessee another chance to prove the prevailing custom. However, the addition on foreign traveling expenses was confirmed due to insufficient evidence of business purpose. The orders were pronounced on 02.11.2012. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:44:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173099 The ITAT partly allowed the Assessee's appeals, directing a reexamination of the bonus payment issue and upholding the addition on foreign traveling expenses for all assessment years. The CIT(A)'s dismissal of the bonus payment addition was set aside, giving the Assessee another chance to prove the prevailing custom. However, the addition on foreign traveling expenses was confirmed due to insufficient evidence of business purpose. The orders were pronounced on 02.11.2012. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173099