https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173098 A candidate who participated in the selection process with knowledge of amended eligibility criteria could not later challenge those criteria. The Court treated pre-doctoral research as capable of being counted towards the required teaching or research experience and held that the appellant met the eligibility standard. It further found that the Selection Committee was properly constituted, the alleged quorum defect was unsupported, and no real or reasonably apprehended bias was shown. In the absence of any mandatory rule requiring written comparative grading, the unanimous expert recommendation was not invalidated. The High Court's interference was set aside and the appellant's appointment was restored. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2025 15:20:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173098 A candidate who participated in the selection process with knowledge of amended eligibility criteria could not later challenge those criteria. The Court treated pre-doctoral research as capable of being counted towards the required teaching or research experience and held that the appellant met the eligibility standard. It further found that the Selection Committee was properly constituted, the alleged quorum defect was unsupported, and no real or reasonably apprehended bias was shown. In the absence of any mandatory rule requiring written comparative grading, the unanimous expert recommendation was not invalidated. The High Court's interference was set aside and the appellant's appointment was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173098