<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173097</link>
    <description>The High Court, Delhi, upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench &#039;D&#039;, regarding a notice for reassessment issued to the assessee under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal found the notice to be beyond the period of limitation and ruled in favor of the assessee. The Court emphasized that the Assessing Officer failed to draw correct inferences from the disclosed facts by the assessee, leading to no failure in disclosing material facts. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173097</link>
      <description>The High Court, Delhi, upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench &#039;D&#039;, regarding a notice for reassessment issued to the assessee under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal found the notice to be beyond the period of limitation and ruled in favor of the assessee. The Court emphasized that the Assessing Officer failed to draw correct inferences from the disclosed facts by the assessee, leading to no failure in disclosing material facts. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>