https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173095 The Supreme Court considered whether recruitment for ministerial staff of subordinate civil courts in 1981 was governed by the 1947 Rules as amended in 1969 or by the 1950 Rules, and held that the 1950 Rules continued to govern because the 1969 amendment did not effectively reintroduce the machinery needed to operate the revised Appendix II. It also held that the 1975 Rules did not repeal the 1950 Rules for subordinate civil courts, because those courts were excluded from the 1975 regime. The challenge to the selection therefore failed, the High Court judgment was set aside, and the selected candidates were entitled to appointment with consequential service benefits, excluding back wages for the period not worked. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173095 The Supreme Court considered whether recruitment for ministerial staff of subordinate civil courts in 1981 was governed by the 1947 Rules as amended in 1969 or by the 1950 Rules, and held that the 1950 Rules continued to govern because the 1969 amendment did not effectively reintroduce the machinery needed to operate the revised Appendix II. It also held that the 1975 Rules did not repeal the 1950 Rules for subordinate civil courts, because those courts were excluded from the 1975 regime. The challenge to the selection therefore failed, the High Court judgment was set aside, and the selected candidates were entitled to appointment with consequential service benefits, excluding back wages for the period not worked. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173095