<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 965 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173092</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee&#039;s payment of service tax with interest before the show cause notice prevented further penalty proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as lawful, with no substantial question of law identified. The appeal and a delay condonation application were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 965 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173092</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee&#039;s payment of service tax with interest before the show cause notice prevented further penalty proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as lawful, with no substantial question of law identified. The appeal and a delay condonation application were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>