https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173090 The interview process for Munsiff recruitment was upheld because the rules required only an overall viva voce assessment of intelligence, general knowledge, personality, aptitude and suitability; they did not require faculty-wise marking or tape-recording, and unsupported allegations of bias and eligibility defects failed. Candidates who participated without protest could not later challenge the process after failure. The select list could be prepared beyond the requisitioned posts, but actual appointments could not exceed the 11 vacancies for which selection was sought in the absence of a further requisition. The list was to operate only for those vacancies and would lapse on their filling or on expiry of one year, excluding the stay period. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:03:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173090 The interview process for Munsiff recruitment was upheld because the rules required only an overall viva voce assessment of intelligence, general knowledge, personality, aptitude and suitability; they did not require faculty-wise marking or tape-recording, and unsupported allegations of bias and eligibility defects failed. Candidates who participated without protest could not later challenge the process after failure. The select list could be prepared beyond the requisitioned posts, but actual appointments could not exceed the 11 vacancies for which selection was sought in the absence of a further requisition. The list was to operate only for those vacancies and would lapse on their filling or on expiry of one year, excluding the stay period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173090