https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173088 Article 15(4) was read broadly to permit reservation of seats in educational admissions, including postgraduate medical courses, and not merely preferences or concessions. The challenge that reservation was anti-merit was rejected because reservation operates at entry stage only, while qualifying standards remain applicable for completion of the course, and academic marks were not treated as a reliable test of professional efficiency. The medical council framework was held to regulate standards of medical education, not to bar State reservation policy, and the State was found competent to prescribe reservation in postgraduate admissions under Entry 25 of List III, with Entry 66 of List I confined to standards and coordination. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2017 15:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173088 Article 15(4) was read broadly to permit reservation of seats in educational admissions, including postgraduate medical courses, and not merely preferences or concessions. The challenge that reservation was anti-merit was rejected because reservation operates at entry stage only, while qualifying standards remain applicable for completion of the course, and academic marks were not treated as a reliable test of professional efficiency. The medical council framework was held to regulate standards of medical education, not to bar State reservation policy, and the State was found competent to prescribe reservation in postgraduate admissions under Entry 25 of List III, with Entry 66 of List I confined to standards and coordination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173088