<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173087</link>
    <description>Reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in teaching recruitment was upheld where Assistant Professor posts in different disciplines carried the same designation and pay scale; roster rotation and carry-forward vacancies could operate in a single post cadre, and general candidates had no right to demand de-reservation absent approval. Reservation in postgraduate, doctoral, speciality and super-speciality medical admissions was also sustained because it affects only entry and does not, by itself, dilute merit or academic excellence, which remain governed by the same standards after admission. The Institute could not unilaterally de-reserve backlog vacancies or throw them open to general candidates without following the governing policy and procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173087</link>
      <description>Reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in teaching recruitment was upheld where Assistant Professor posts in different disciplines carried the same designation and pay scale; roster rotation and carry-forward vacancies could operate in a single post cadre, and general candidates had no right to demand de-reservation absent approval. Reservation in postgraduate, doctoral, speciality and super-speciality medical admissions was also sustained because it affects only entry and does not, by itself, dilute merit or academic excellence, which remain governed by the same standards after admission. The Institute could not unilaterally de-reserve backlog vacancies or throw them open to general candidates without following the governing policy and procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>