<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 410 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263742</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing remission on duty for goods destroyed due to flooding. The Court emphasized the department&#039;s inaction and held that the department cannot benefit from its own failure to act promptly. It dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the department&#039;s procedure was unjust and finding no substantial legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 410 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263742</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing remission on duty for goods destroyed due to flooding. The Court emphasized the department&#039;s inaction and held that the department cannot benefit from its own failure to act promptly. It dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the department&#039;s procedure was unjust and finding no substantial legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>