<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 3 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the interest amount imposed for belated service tax remittance. The decision was based on the understanding that during the relevant period, the appellant operated as a Central Government Department, following a Tribunal precedent that no interest should be charged for delays in crediting service tax to the Government account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 3 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the interest amount imposed for belated service tax remittance. The decision was based on the understanding that during the relevant period, the appellant operated as a Central Government Department, following a Tribunal precedent that no interest should be charged for delays in crediting service tax to the Government account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>