<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s additions as income, ruling that the assessees failed to prove the nature and source of the gifts under section 68. The Tribunal held that the AO could scrutinize returns filed under section 153A, as there were no concluded proceedings before the search. The Special Bench decision was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of prior concluded proceedings. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the additions made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s additions as income, ruling that the assessees failed to prove the nature and source of the gifts under section 68. The Tribunal held that the AO could scrutinize returns filed under section 153A, as there were no concluded proceedings before the search. The Special Bench decision was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of prior concluded proceedings. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the additions made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>