<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 6 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the joint venture company, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the penalty amount and the remaining tax balance. The decision was based on the absence of fixed service tax liability on the foreign service provider, making the demand on the joint venture company legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 6 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the joint venture company, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the penalty amount and the remaining tax balance. The decision was based on the absence of fixed service tax liability on the foreign service provider, making the demand on the joint venture company legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>