<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions related to unsecured loans from two creditors due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies but accepting the loan from the third creditor as genuine. Additionally, the Tribunal adjusted the estimation of household withdrawals based on evidence, leading to partial success for the assessee in challenging the income determination by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 379 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions related to unsecured loans from two creditors due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies but accepting the loan from the third creditor as genuine. Additionally, the Tribunal adjusted the estimation of household withdrawals based on evidence, leading to partial success for the assessee in challenging the income determination by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>