https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173080 A landlord-tenant dispute over possession of premises owned by a co-operative bank was held not to be a dispute "touching the business of the society" under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, because that phrase refers to the society's actual trading or commercial activity, not its general affairs. The tenant was also not a person claiming through a member, as the tenancy did not arise from a transaction entered into by the member in that capacity. The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 was treated as the special statute governing possession disputes, so its exclusive jurisdiction under Section 28 prevailed and Registrar jurisdiction was excluded. en-us Thu, 29 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 18:26:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173080 A landlord-tenant dispute over possession of premises owned by a co-operative bank was held not to be a dispute "touching the business of the society" under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, because that phrase refers to the society's actual trading or commercial activity, not its general affairs. The tenant was also not a person claiming through a member, as the tenancy did not arise from a transaction entered into by the member in that capacity. The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 was treated as the special statute governing possession disputes, so its exclusive jurisdiction under Section 28 prevailed and Registrar jurisdiction was excluded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173080