<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (2) TMI 137 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173069</link>
    <description>Under Article 166(3) of the Constitution, the Governor may frame rules for convenient transaction of State business and allocate departmental functions accordingly. In the context of section 68(C) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the opinion required for a draft nationalisation scheme could validly be formed by the departmental Secretary where the transport business had been allotted to the Transport Minister and the Secretary was authorised under the business rules. Such action by a duly authorised official is treated in law as the act of the Government. The rules of business were therefore valid, the Secretary&#039;s opinion was legally sufficient, and the challenge to the draft scheme failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (2) TMI 137 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173069</link>
      <description>Under Article 166(3) of the Constitution, the Governor may frame rules for convenient transaction of State business and allocate departmental functions accordingly. In the context of section 68(C) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the opinion required for a draft nationalisation scheme could validly be formed by the departmental Secretary where the transport business had been allotted to the Transport Minister and the Secretary was authorised under the business rules. Such action by a duly authorised official is treated in law as the act of the Government. The rules of business were therefore valid, the Secretary&#039;s opinion was legally sufficient, and the challenge to the draft scheme failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>