https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173066 An authenticated executive notification is not invalid merely because it was processed and issued by an authorised departmental officer, where the Rules of Business and valid standing orders permit such delegation and the statute does not require personal ministerial or gubernatorial satisfaction at that stage. Article 166(2) conclusively establishes that the order is one made by the Governor, but it does not bar challenge to the legality of the underlying decision. In the Section 4 context of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, no statutory duty required personal consideration by the Minister-in-charge or consultation with the Land Planning Committee before the notification issued, so the challenge to validity failed. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:57:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173066 An authenticated executive notification is not invalid merely because it was processed and issued by an authorised departmental officer, where the Rules of Business and valid standing orders permit such delegation and the statute does not require personal ministerial or gubernatorial satisfaction at that stage. Article 166(2) conclusively establishes that the order is one made by the Governor, but it does not bar challenge to the legality of the underlying decision. In the Section 4 context of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948, no statutory duty required personal consideration by the Minister-in-charge or consultation with the Land Planning Committee before the notification issued, so the challenge to validity failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173066